Issue #2: Vote

3 comments:

  1. Potentate Wade said...

    I voted for #3 simply because I think an Offensive Player would shake things up, but we probably shouldn't have an option of playing 4 RBs (which you could pull off in #2), which is, as Whitey pointed out, reeeediculous.  

  2. John Herrington said...

    I like #2 because 4 RBs is my type of fantasy.  

  3. Bum Ellis said...

    Dearest Potentate,

    Toeskis votes for #2 (unlike Smoke 'n Lose, he hates IDPs), but he doesn't have access to a computer.  


 

Copyright 2006| Blogger Templates by GeckoandFly modified and converted to Blogger Beta by Blogcrowds.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.